<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gabriel de Kadt &#187; p*orkflow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lazydada.com/tag/porkflow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lazydada.com</link>
	<description>Personal notes on Mac based web development and design.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 10:47:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Flickr fool</title>
		<link>http://www.lazydada.com/2009-05-09/flickr-fool/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=flickr-fool</link>
		<comments>http://www.lazydada.com/2009-05-09/flickr-fool/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 15:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[archives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p*orkflow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workflow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazydada.com/?p=320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[P[hotographic w]ork flow Flickr. Been using it for years &#8211; with periodic hiatus[es] &#8211; always worried about losing pictures to sneaky internet thievery &#8211; and at the same time wondering how to keep a proper archive of my photos. Restricted access to Flickr Well &#8211; I can use Flickr without worrying about the first point. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4>P[hotographic w]ork flow</h4>
<p>Flickr. Been using it for years &#8211; with periodic hiatus[es] &#8211; always worried about losing pictures to sneaky internet thievery &#8211; and at the same time wondering how to keep a proper archive of my photos.</p>
<h3>Restricted access to Flickr</h3>
<p>Well &#8211; I can use Flickr without worrying about the first point. Just found out that I can select who from my contacts or the whole universe has access to the see all sizes/download this picture option.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d looked for this feature before &#8211; last time must have been at least year ago &#8211; without finding it. I guess it may be a &#8220;new&#8221; feature &#8211; or just a very well hidden one &#8211; as there were so many photographers&#8217; photostreams that I had download rights too.</p>
<h3>Time to backup</h3>
<p>So now &#8211; slowly does it I can backup my entire photographic history to Flickr and get decent off-site cloud based backups. Delicious.</p>
<p>All that&#8217;s missing now is to find a plug-in for Bridge/Lightroom/Aperture that will sync changes in my master archive with the Flickr one&#8230;</p>
<p>p*orkflow anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lazydada.com/2009-05-09/flickr-fool/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>P*orkflow part two</title>
		<link>http://www.lazydada.com/2008-02-24/porkflow-part-two/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=porkflow-part-two</link>
		<comments>http://www.lazydada.com/2008-02-24/porkflow-part-two/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 13:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Graphic arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p*orkflow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photograhy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workflow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazydada.com/?p=14</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[P[hotographic w]ork flow So, why the hog of a workflow? Needs are tagging, editing, pixel pushing, publishing and archiving. Some kind of database to keep track of it all. My problem is that I seem to be using a raft of applications to achieve this, applications that do not seamlessly integrate with each other or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4>P[hotographic w]ork flow</h4>
<p>So, why the hog of a workflow?</p>
<p>Needs are tagging, editing, pixel pushing, publishing and archiving. Some kind of database to keep track of it all. </p>
<p>My problem is that I seem to be using a raft of applications to achieve this, applications that do not seamlessly integrate with each other or meet all my needs. I find I&#8217;m fighting the software and repeating myself.  </p>
<p>Adobe&#8217;s Lightroom seems to be the best contender and can do most of this*. Along my path to digital photo nirvana I have met many software applications. Some have become firm friends. Others; well, I&#8217;ve followed the Yellow Brick Road and met a couple of wicked witches too. Problem is these witches don&#8217;t look like witches &#8211; they (usually) look lovely but cast a strong frustration spell (Extensis Portfolio ≤v.8 &#8211; I&#8217;m talking to you. Roundtrip Metadata. My arse.) .</p>
<p>I currently use Adobe&#8217;s Bridge, Photoshop, Apple&#8217;s iPhoto and Flickr. Occasionally I&#8217;ll use Graphic Converter because I love the ease of Geotagging therein.<br />
Bridge is the daddy for tagging, rating and adding metadata. It provides hooks into the most useful Photoshop batch processing options &#8211; particularly the Image Processor. Keywording could have an easier interface &#8211; lists of Keywords and keyword sets quickly become unwieldy &#8211; but there&#8217;s always the File/File Info&#8230; menu to add keywords by hand to any selected files.<br />
Photoshop &#8211; the only tool allows masking and selective edits the only serious image editing software I&#8217;ve ever used.<br />
iPhoto &#8211; for want of a better DAM &#8211; it&#8217;s free easy to use and useful for minor edits. Anything I want to keep on my laptop lives in my iPhoto library.<br />
Flickr &#8211; Flickr is fun &#8211; you know &#8211; relatively cheap online storage and publishing if you like. I wish it would allow me to restrict access to high res version of my photos &#8211; and allow me to offer photos for sale on-line. But it doesn&#8217;t. So while it&#8217;s fun &#8211; it&#8217;s of limited use.</p>
<p>Recently I&#8217;ve been giving Lightroom another go. At work on a quad core G5 it&#8217;s great. Here on my 12&#8243; PowerBook it runs like an old dog. An old dog with three legs. And two of those have arthritis. I&#8217;d love to try Aperture &#8211; but my PowerBook doesn&#8217;t make the minimum requirements. </p>
<p>I guess the most important feature of all is the publishing. I&#8217;ve only just realised this. The rest well &#8211; the rest just helps. I used to publish to .mac with iPhoto. But was getting unwieldy with limited options re controlling the look of it all. I figured damn the control and moved to Flickr. With Flickr I conceded control over the look of the all important first page. I loved the Flickr community &#8211; but sitting behind a firewall or being away from an internet connection several days per week has taken the social network shine off it and my Flickr pages&#8217; interestingness is suffering. I suppose we&#8217;re supposed to suffer for our art. Now I&#8217;m back with the presentation problem. It really is important to me and Flickr doesn&#8217;t let me present images. With Flickr you upload and that&#8217;s it. A bucket of photos. Perhaps I should acknowledge I&#8217;m not taking enough interesting photos! </p>
<p>*It doesn&#8217;t do geotagging or masking (a vital part of any virtual darkroom).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lazydada.com/2008-02-24/porkflow-part-two/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>P*orkflow</title>
		<link>http://www.lazydada.com/2007-10-21/photo-workflow/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=photo-workflow</link>
		<comments>http://www.lazydada.com/2007-10-21/photo-workflow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 00:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Graphic arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p*orkflow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photoshop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workflow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazydada.com/10/photo-workflow/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[*P[hotography-w]orkflow Currently a mix of Bridge, Graphic Converter, Photoshop, iPhoto and Flickr. Photo workflow aint good. Throw in a bit of terminal action jhead -mkexif when stuck with [enjoying] 35mm film. Oh &#8211; add Flickr Uploadr and Google Earth for the geotagging. Bit of a mess. Too many apps. Too much system overhead. Not a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h6>*P[hotography-w]orkflow</h6>
<p>Currently a mix of Bridge, Graphic Converter, Photoshop, iPhoto and Flickr. Photo workflow aint good. </p>
<p>Throw in a bit of terminal action <code>jhead -mkexif</code> when stuck with [enjoying] 35mm film. Oh &#8211; add Flickr Uploadr and Google Earth for the geotagging. Bit of a mess. </p>
<p>Too many apps. Too much system overhead. Not a lean-mean-workflow machine. </p>
<p>In fact a real hog. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lazydada.com/2007-10-21/photo-workflow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
